WHEN GOOGLE MET WIKILEAKS PDF
In June , Julian Assange received an unusual visitor: The Chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt, together with an entourage of US State. In June , Julian Assange received an unusual visitor: the chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt, arrived from America at Ellingham Hall, the country residence in. And also You can download or read online all Book PDF file that Download file Book PDF When Google Met WikiLeaks at Complete PDF Library. This.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Hindi|
|Genre:||Fiction & Literature|
|ePub File Size:||28.35 MB|
|PDF File Size:||18.39 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
This books (When Google Met Wikileaks [DOWNLOAD]) Made by Julian Assange About Books none To Download Please Click. A state's terrorism is also manifest in the military doctrine of its armed forces. The doctrine The History of Terrori When Google Met WikiLeaks. Schmidt had taken over as CEO of Google in and built it into an empire. I was intrigued that the mountain would come to. Muhammad. But it was not until.
The situation would then be harder to spin into another legal or political assault.
Predictably, this statement was initially greeted with bureaucratic disbelief. We soon found ourselves in a reenactment of that scene in Dr. Strangelove, where Peter Sellers cold-calls the White House to warn of an impending nuclear war and is immediately put on hold.
He told us he would call us back. We hung up, and waited. Sarah Harrison and Julian Assange call the U. State Department in September When the phone rang half an hour later, it was not the State Department on the other end of the line.
He had just received an email from Lisa Shields seeking to confirm that it was indeed WikiLeaks calling the State Department. It was at this point that I realized Eric Schmidt might not have been an emissary of Google alone.
Flow – Psychology of Optimal Experience
Whether officially or not, he had been keeping some company that placed him very close to Washington, DC, including a well-documented relationship with President Obama. But at the time it was a novel thought. Google had turned up on their radar. He could be placed in Egypt during the revolution, meeting with Wael Ghonim, the Google employee whose arrest and imprisonment hours later would make him a PR-friendly symbol of the uprising in the Western press.
Meetings had been planned in Palestine and Turkey, both of which—claimed Stratfor emails—were killed by the senior Google leadership as too risky. In reality they are doing things the CIA cannot do. State Department cables released as part of Cablegate reveal that Cohen had been in Afghanistan in , trying to convince the four major Afghan mobile phone companies to move their antennas onto US military bases. This sounds like a great idea.
But if it was ever true, it has not been for decades. The last forty years has seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy. It is not just obvious neocon front groups like Foreign Policy Initiative. Scan the memberships of the biggest US think tanks and institutes and the same names keep cropping up.
And that makes you the kind of leaders we need. Bernstein after he resigned from Human Rights Watch which he had originally founded because he felt it should not cover Israeli and US human rights abuses.
Google Ideas is bigger, but it follows the same game plan. He attended high school in Arlington, Virginia, before graduating with a degree in engineering from Princeton. By the time he left Sun, sixteen years later, he had become part of its executive leadership.
The foundation and its staff serves as an influence mill, using its network of approved national security, foreign policy, and technology pundits to place hundreds of articles and op-eds per year.
By Schmidt had become chairman of its board of directors. I had been too eager to see a politically unambitious Silicon Valley engineer, a relic of the good old days of computer science graduate culture on the West Coast.
On a personal level, Schmidt and Cohen are perfectly likable people. And that is a problem. Google is "visionary". Google is "the future". Google is "more than just a company". Google "gives back to the community".
Google is "a force for good". Even when Google airs its corporate ambivalence publicly, it does little to dislodge these items of faith. A few symbolic open letters to the White House later and it seems all is forgiven. Many privacy advocates justify a predominant focus on abuses by the state on the basis that the state enjoys a monopoly on coercive force This view downplays the fact that powerful corporations are part of the nexus of power around the state, and that they enjoy the ability to deploy its coercive power, just as the state often exerts its influence through the agency of powerful corporations.
The movement to abolish privacy is twin-horned.
Privacy advocates who focus exclusively on one of those horns will find themselves gored on the other. Clearly, it's an ethic Schmidt lives by. Here are some other quotes that jumped out at me: In some ways the higher echelons of Google seemed more distant and obscure to me than the halls of Washington.
We had been locking horns with senior US officials for years by that point. The mystique had worn off. But the power centers growing up in Silicon Valley were still opaque and I was suddenly conscious of an opportunity to understand and influence what was becoming the most influential company on earth.
It was Cohen who, while he was still at the Department of State, was said to have emailed Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to delay scheduled maintenance in order to assist the aborted uprising in Iran. WikiLeaks had always been a guerilla publisher.
When Google Met WikiLeaks
We would draw surveillance and censorship in one jurisdiction and redeploy in another, moving across borders like ghosts. Google is "the future". Google is "more than just a company". Google "gives back to the community". Google is "a force for good". In , Google arrived on the list of top-spending Washington, DC, lobbyists—a list typically stalked exclusively by the US Chamber of Commerce, military contractors, and the petrocarbon leviathans.
In Autumn the Obama administration was trying to drum up support for US airstrikes against Syria. Despite setbacks, the administration continued to press for military action well into September with speeches and public announcements by both President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry. Secretary Kerry answers questions on Syria.
On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen
Today via Hangout at 2pm ET. If anything has changed since those words were written, it is that Silicon Valley has grown restless with that passive role , aspiring instead to adorn the "hidden fist" like a velvet glove. Writing in , Schmidt and Cohen stated,. This was one of many bold assertions made by Schmidt and Cohen in their book, which was eventually published in April Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business".
By the time it came out, I had formally sought and received political asylum from the government of Ecuador, and taken refuge in its embassy in London. At that point I had already spent nearly a year in the embassy under police surveillance, blocked from safe passage out of the UK.
Billed as a visionary forecast of global technological change, the book failed to deliver—failed even to imagine a future, good or bad, substantially different to the present. The scholarship was poor—even degenerate. It did not seem to fit the profile of Schmidt, that sharp, quiet man in my living room. But reading on I began to see that the book was not a serious attempt at future history.
It was a love song from Google to official Washington. For an American internet services monopoly to ensure global market dominance it cannot simply keep doing what it is doing, and let politics take care of itself.
American strategic and economic hegemony becomes a vital pillar of its market dominance. An idea whose time has come—and gone? For these emails and more, see the collection of sources at when. This email is included in the collection of sources at when. This cable is included in the collection of sources at when.
In May , WikiLeaks revealed that the NSA had gained access to all Afghan mobile phone calls and was recording all of them for later retrieval. Collection available at: See also the collection of sources at when. For more on Jared Cohen from the WikiLeaks archives see archive. So Jared Cohen was at DoS then and played a major role in starting the organization. The main goal was just spreading the good word about the US.
The Sourcewatch. Edelman, Inc. For the sponsors of Movements.
See also a screenshot of the results listed for Eric and Wendy Schmidt on the Open Secrets website, archive.
Hauser profile on the New America Foundation website: Jonathan Soros profile on the New America Foundation website: Helene D. Gayle profile on the New America Foundation website: Daniel Yergin profile on the New America Foundation website: See the full board of directors on the New America Foundation website: It is time for US President Barack Obama to demonstrate that he can order the offensive use of force in circumstances other than secret drone attacks or covert operations.
The result will change the strategic calculus not only in Damascus, but also in Moscow, not to mention Beijing and Tokyo. Jared Cohen has retweeted approval for Slaughter on the issue. In , Palantir was involved in the HBGary scandal, having been exposed as part of a group of contractors proposing to take down WikiLeaks.
White House visitor records are available from its website, archive. Partially, this is a vestigial ethic from the Californian libertarian origins of online pro-privacy campaigning. Partially, it is a symptom of the superior public relations enjoyed by Silicon Valley technology corporations, and the fact that those corporations also provide the bulk of private funding for the flagship digital privacy advocacy groups, leading to a conflict of interest. At the individual level, many of even the most committed privacy campaigners have an unacknowledged addiction to easy-to-use, privacy-destroying amenities like Gmail, Facebook and Apple products.
As a result, privacy campaigners frequently overlook corporate surveillance abuses. When they do address the abuses of companies like Google, campaigners tend to appeal to the logic of the market, urging companies to make small concessions to user privacy in order to repair their approval ratings. There is the false assumption that market forces ensure that Silicon Valley is a natural government antagonist, and that it wants to be on the public's side—that profit-driven multinational corporations partake more of the spirit of democracy than government agencies.
Many privacy advocates justify a predominant focus on abuses by the state on the basis that the state enjoys a monopoly on coercive force. This view downplays the fact that powerful corporations are part of the nexus of power around the state, and that they enjoy the ability to deploy its coercive power, just as the state often exerts its influence through the agency of powerful corporations. The movement to abolish privacy is twin-horned. Privacy advocates who focus exclusively on one of those horns will find themselves gored on the other.
The program was officially discontinued in after public outcry, but its legacy can arguably be seen in recent disclosures on bulk spying by the National Security Agency. Is Thomas Drake an enemy of the state? See Seymour M. See also Seymour M. Google explicitly prides itself on keeping its front page free of all interference. Its purity and sacredness are incorporated into Google's corporate manifesto: Placement in search results is never sold to anyone, and advertising is not only clearly marked as such, it offers relevant content and is not distracting.
On the rare occasions Google adds a single line to the search page to plug its own projects, like the Chrome browser, that choice itself becomes news.
Google is committing to this ambition.RT , September 20th But when my colleague Joseph Farrell told me the executive chairman of Google wanted to make an appointment with me, I was listening.
Google is "a force for good". Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. Assange announced that he would run for the Australian Senate in March under the new WikiLeaks Party ,   and Cypherpunks  was published in November. See also a screenshot of the results listed for Eric and Wendy Schmidt on the Open Secrets website, archive.
She human history and human beings. Views Total views. Many privacy advocates justify a predominant focus on abuses by the state on the basis that the state enjoys a monopoly on coercive force.
In , after taking over Keyhole, a mapping tech startup cofunded by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency NGA and the CIA, Google developed the technology into Google Maps, an enterprise version of which it has since shopped to the Pentagon and associated federal and state agencies on multimillion-dollar contracts.